User:MXP.J/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Automatic behavior

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I selected this article since it's a topic will see in my mind-body class, and it's a topic that intrigued me.

Evaluate the article
Lead section: The article as a good introductory sentence that clearly explains the topic. However, the article does not have a table of content that includes the different sections of the topic. Therefore, the lead section is not separate from the rest of the article.

Content: As for the content, there is not a lot of information written about the topic, and there are a few missing citations.

Tone and balance: The article is very neutral about the topic and does not show signs of being biased.

Source and reference: There are a lot of missing citations on the page and some sources are a bit dated. However, the sources do seem reliable and the links work.

Images and media: There are no images on the Wikipedia page. Images should definitely be added to make it more appealing. Also, the article is not very organized as it is not broken into different sections.

Talk page: Only one comment about “fancy tags” from 2009. No discussion. The page is part of three wiki projects: Wikiproject medicine, Wikiproject physiology and Wikiproject neuroscience.

Overall: The article could be improved by adding sections, adding citations and adding images. The article is considered a subclass article since it lacks content and is only a start. In short,the article needs work and is poorly developed.