User:Maartaacruz/sandbox

Draft

Immigration Voice History-

Immigration Voice is a non-profit organization that helps immigrants, legislative and executive branches of government solving problems in the employment with the green card process due to delays, USCIS processing and Labor Certification. Immigration Voice purpose is to improve immigration laws and employment were immigrants can enter to the Unites States economy easier and faster.

Immigration Voice should not be considered an organization based upon equality for all. Immigration Voice is an organization with the purpose of immigration process for highly skilled professionals such as doctors and engineers. Another goal involves giving those countries with highly skilled workers quicker access to green cards than those countries that bring mostly unskilled labor.

Goals/Accomplishments-

Immigrations Voice's main goal is to speed up the delays with green cards for immigrants in order to work legally within the United States. Usually the green card system takes between 6 -12 years before a foreign individual may be granted permanent residence to the United States.

A second goal of Immigration Voice is to eliminate "per-country" green cards. The application for the green card for India, Mexico, China and the Philippines are stocked. Green cards are limited to 7% in each country. So many countries do not meet their annual quota and they do not issue the amount of green cards they are permitted. This is a reason why Immigration Voice is attempting to promote legislation that would change the laws so that a countries such as India could use green cards from another nation. This will help its citizens get permanent residency in the United States.

Currently Immigration Voice has accomplished to smoothen the entrance into the United States for skilled workers. In September 2009 Immigration Voice was necessary in getting the screening process for foreign scientists down to two weeks. The non-profit organization also accomplished a victorious campaign that resulted in the USCIS liberate the data of pending green card applications on their website.

One of the biggest accomplishment for Immigration Voice is being involved in the movement of the DREAM Act.  The DREAM Act was first suggested in 2001 and has recently been reintroduced in the Senate. The Act would allow permanent residency to illegal alien-students who arrived to the U.S. as minors, graduated from U.S. high schools and lived in the country for five or more, prior to the bills enactment. California has embrace a version of the DREAM Act that would allow illegal alien children living in the United States to be given private college scholarships to state schools.

What Processes do they do?

Who do they partner with?

Immigration History-

Bibliography

Immigration Voice

Alex Nowrasteh, President Trump’s Immigration Plans, Cato Institute, Washington DC, 2016

Claire Felter, Danielle Renwick, The U.S. Immigration Debate, Council on Foreign Relations, New York, NY, 2018

Laws, Immigration Voice, Immigration Voice, Santa Clara, CA, 2017

Topics

White Balloon Day- This article can be can be improve by many things. The article is missing resources and a lot of information. Since the article is missing a lot of information this article can easily have areas added. In this articles Talk Page seem to have a poor discussion about the topic.

Immigration Voice- This article has no information. This article can be improved by researching and giving important information about the topic to the readers. This article seem not have a Talk Page.

Both of the articles need information and references to be added.

Article Evaluation

Trump administration family separation policy


 * 1) Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?  In this article, all the information provided is relevant to the topic. The article does contain lots of information to sink in. One thing that distracted me is the way the information is categorize. Everything make sense but I feel it could be more specific and easily to understand.
 * 2) Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? The article obtains many references. The article does seem to be neutral but when you go to the talk page of the article it does seem wrong information has been provided.  Also when opening the article, the article does inform you that the information provided can be changed anytime as this is a current event. Also warns you about some information being unreliable.
 * 3) Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?  This article have overrepresented view points.
 * 4) Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article? The links work, they support the claims, but I feel this type of article should obtain more references to chain their viewpoints and make them stronger.
 * 5) Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted? All references seem appropriate and reliable.  This sources seem to be small articles that pop into social media and news online. Bias is noted.
 * 6) Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added? All information seem to be current, it seems the article is still being put in new information. I will be honest, there can be many information added and be supported with more than one reference. It seems there is no information missing but we might of miss information that is still not in this article.
 * 7) Check out the Talk page of the article. What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? After going through the articles talk page, it seems that the article can be fixed and make the information more reliable with more than one reference. The article may have many information but that doesn't mean it is the right one.  Editors seem to discuss about the new information they want to insert or fix. They provide new references.
 * 8) How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? This article is part of Wikimedia Foundation and MediaWiki.
 * 9) How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class or the way you've seen it talked about in other spaces? The way Wikipedia discusses the topic is different when discussing it with a class because you are reading what other have to say, you have to look for their reference and see where that information came from. When discussing it in a class, you get to analyze and listen to what the student have to say about the information, but when you talk about it with somebody else is difficult to obtain a reference at the instant. Is more of an opinion than a reliable information.