User:Mabdul/PROD log

This is a log of all proposed deletion tags applied or endorsed by this user using Twinkle's PROD module.

If you no longer wish to keep this log, you can turn it off using the preferences panel, and nominate this page for speedy deletion under CSD U1.

August 2011

 * 1) Kedara-Gouri road Hanuman Temple: PROD; notified  17:17, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) * Reason: Please add corrected cited and more references (check WP:REFB)
 * 3) **Contested by User:Phil Bridger mabdul 21:03, 30 September 2011 (UTC)

September 2011

 * 1) Amazon Webstore: PROD; notified  23:17, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) * Reason: I doubt that this article has enough content to get its own article. At the moment I see weasle words, no references and advertising/howto content. added a few minutes later. mabdul 09:46, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) Nationwide Access Register: PROD; notified  09:58, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) * Reason: Unreferenced, a little bit of advertisement, other major problems.
 * 5) APDM ArcGIS: PROD; notified  21:00, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
 * 6) * Reason: Not notable, didn't find any news coverage.

October 2011

 * 1) Anadocs: PROD; notified  10:32, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) * Reason: Can't find any newscoverage.
 * 3) Genesis Publications: PROD; notified  12:32, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) * Reason: No sign of notability
 * 5) Love Happens Like That: PROD; notified  19:17, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
 * 6) * Reason: Non notable book, at least I couldn't find any newscoverage nor reliable web reference.

November 2011

 * 1) Love Happens Like That: PROD; notified  15:26, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) * Reason: again (tag was sadly removed by an IP): Non notable book, at least I couldn't find any newscoverage nor reliable web reference.

December 2011

 * 1) InrecoLan FuzzyMath: PROD; notified  12:59, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) * Reason: I don't see the notability of this addin, I wasn't also able to find some independent newscoverage, so please improve it or redirect/merge it in OOo.org.
 * 3) F1rst: PROD; notified  15:48, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) * Reason: unreferenced, possible not notable per WP:MUSIC.

January 2012

 * 1) Korg AX3000G: PROD; notified  00:32, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) * Reason: Why is that thing notable? It is missing independent reference and all that stuff. even the image seems a copyvio!
 * 3) Comparison of pastebins: PROD; notified  10:01, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) * Reason: nice list, but there is no 3rd part ref and all table entries should be removed per WP:WTAF; WP:EL/WP:ELNO.

February 2012

 * 1) Forest Lake Camp: PROD; notified  14:02, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) * Reason: Nothing notable except that this camp is long in business, no reliable references, per WP:MILL
 * 3) Rully Shabara & Wukir Suryadi's Senyawa: PROD; notified  01:58, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) * Reason: Can't see why this music group fits in WP:MUSIC
 * 5) ConnectBot: PROD; notified  20:19, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
 * 6) * Reason: Don't see any reason that this would not fail WP:NSOFT
 * 7) Orbot: PROD; notified  20:20, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
 * 8) * Reason: Don't see any reason that this would not fail WP:NSOFT
 * 9) CoolNovo: PROD; notified  08:02, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
 * 10) * Reason: unreferenced and in my eyes fails WP:NSOFT.

March 2012

 * 1) The Woman on Platform 8: PROD; notified  16:32, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) * Reason: by WP:NOTPLOT, unreferenced, doesn't show any notability, unreferenced...

April 2012

 * 1) Angels Care Christian Academy of Bulacan, Inc.: PROD; notified  11:52, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) * Reason: I don't see that this company is notable per WP:CORP, nor does it cite any independent, relaible source.
 * 3) Mageia: PROD; notified  08:52, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) * Reason: I don't see why this fork is notable, moreover it doesn't cite any reference.
 * 5) School of Physics & Applied Math: PROD; notified  19:01, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
 * 6) * Reason: I doubt that this institute is notable, totally unreferenced and using peacock terms.
 * 7) Remix EP: PROD; notified  08:53, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
 * 8) * Reason: Fails WP:NMUSIC, no coverage.
 * only reinstall of the previous PROD since it was promised that the user will change anything, but didn't...
 * School of Physics & Applied Math: PROD; notified 09:24, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: restoring PROD notice as nothing changed: "I doubt that this institute is notable, totally unreferenced and using peacock terms."
 * 2) Akboria: PROD; notified  10:17, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) * Reason: Lack independent, reliable and third party references, I don't see why it is notable per WP:CORP and it reads a bit like a advertising which should go more to wikicompany...
 * 4) Millennium Scholastic School & College: PROD; notified  11:30, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
 * 5) * Reason: "A company, corporation, organization, school, team, religion, group, product, or service is notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in secondary sources. Such sources must be reliable, and independent of the subject.  A single independent source is almost never sufficient for demonstrating the notability of an organization." - Notability (organizations and companies)
 * 6) Attack Cat: endorsed PROD. 01:35, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
 * 7) * Reason: after an intensive search, I couldn't find any relevant ref... fails also WP:NMUSIC

May 2012

 * Star FK Radium: PROD; notified 11:49, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Reason: fails WP:NMUSIC (reverted, was at afd -.-)


 * 1) Beautiful Killer: PROD; notified  15:05, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) * Reason: This article doesn't state why it is notable per WP:NBOOK.
 * 3) Triggergirl 6: PROD; notified  15:06, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) * Reason: Why is this book notable?
 * 5) Twilight Experiment: PROD; notified  17:30, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
 * 6) * Reason: No sign of notability, fails WP:NBOOK.
 * 7) Glom (software): PROD; notified  23:34, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
 * 8) * Reason: GNOME Office was deleted after Articles for deletion/GNOME Office - I'm not 100% sure if that has something to do, but why is that office suite notable?

July 2012

 * 1) HTML5 Editor: PROD; notified  20:41, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) * Reason: unreferenced, fails WP:NSOFT.
 * 3) Adobe BrowserLab: PROD; notified  13:40, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) * Reason: Just another web page which checks every web browser for compatibility... Nothing special, doesn't meet GNG nor NWEB.

September 2012

 * 1) Nefu Da Boss: BLP PROD; notified  19:39, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

October 2012

 * 1) Renato Vera Diaz: BLP PROD; notified  12:52, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

November 2012

 * 1) Boeing 1211-J: PROD; notified  20:09, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) * Reason: No evidence of existence; lack of reliable source.

January 2013

 * 1) Vincent Herbert: BLP PROD; notified  09:22, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) Polaris Office: PROD; notified  20:30, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) * Reason: per WP:42 - this article doesn't include any independent, third party, and reliable source.
 * 4) WinJournal: PROD; notified  21:27, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
 * 5) * Reason: simply spam without any information why this software is WP:NOTABLE.

February 2013

 * 1) Racha Arodaky: BLP PROD; notified  11:21, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) Yahya Arodaki: BLP PROD; notified  11:23, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) Hancom Office Suite: PROD; notified  13:11, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) * Reason: I can't see why/how this software passes WP:NSOFT. Please add reliable, independent, third party references!

March 2013

 * 1) Celframe Office: PROD; notified  19:16, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) * Reason: 2 dead links, two pr links and two times the same article which doesn't include an depth review. Totally fails WP:42 and WP:NSOFT.
 * 3) Love Your Color: PROD; notified  09:10, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) * Reason: But why s this product WP:N? This article is missing any independent, reliable, and third party reference!

April 2013

 * 1) EM Client: PROD; notified  18:48, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) * Reason: No indication of notability per WP:NSOFT and completely unreferenced.

July 2013

 * 1) KForge: PROD; notified  05:47, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) * Reason: This article does not include any independent, reliable and 3rd party reference, and I cannot see any claim that this software is in any kind notable.