User:Mac168/Benthic boundary layer/TaylorRclantonPrice Peer Review

Lead:

 * New content has been added.
 * Does have an introductory sentence.


 * Does not have a brief description of major sections.


 * Does have new info.
 * Is concise.

Content:

 * Content is relevant
 * content is up to date
 * Does have content, but could go into more detail about benthic organisms. There was a brief mention of those organisms but these organisms could be talked about in more detail with images and could mention importance in ecology.
 * Talks about equity gap/lesser detailed academic topic on Wikipedia.

Tone and Balance:

 * Content is neutral.
 * No bias
 * Future directions is underrepresented. There could be mentions of current issues in preserving benthic communities and how they are working to solve them. Also, the mention of climate could be elaborated on in a way that describes how climate change effects the benthic regions.
 * no persuasion.

Sources and References:

 * Some sources are a bit older and from the 80s and 90s
 * Sources are all unique and different from each other but do not deviate from topic.
 * I was able to use the source links efficiently.

Organization:

 * I think "Life in the Deep Sea Benthic Boundary Layer" should go before Sediment section.
 * I did not catch any grammatical errors.
 * overall well organized in main sections, but within sections could be more organized. For example the third paragraph in "Life in the Deep Sea Benthic Boundary Layer" should be moved before the second.

Images and Media:

 * No images: images could be added to enhance article

Overall Impressions:
Overall the article is well put together. There was a lot of information that was added that I believe is essential to making the article better. I think more details in the future section and the life section in the benthic article could have a lot more in depth detail about organisms or how or what scientists are doing in the benthic regions right now. The article was very organized and gave great examples of organisms living in the benthic region.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)