User:Mac672/Rich Dad/Sam Lindberg Peer Review

Rich Dad Positives
This article has already done a very good job at describing the Rich Dad brand and does an equally good follow up job describing the book and games. For each topic, I was able to identify the who's, what's, where's, when's, why's, and how's if that had not already been identified.

Areas for Improvement
One part of the article I thought could be improved was the order in which the information is displayed. I didn't like how controversy was between the Rich Dad Games section and the Rich Dad Education. Logically, I think think the controversy should be added at the end of the article. Furthermore, I think that the controversy section could also be improved. As someone who is unfamiliar with this topic, I was left wanting to know the results of the controversy. Most importantly, I think that the Rich Dad Education section needs to be updated, or integrated into another section. Perhaps adding it as a sub section to the Rich Dad Brand introduction paragraph would work best. As always, remember to add citations and pictures, the beginning of the article lacks both of them, which is also something I'm working on for my article.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Mac672


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User has not made a draft yet, so I thought it would be best to give tips on where to start. User:Mac672/Rich Dad


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Rich Dad

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)