User:MacS1975/Evaluate an Article

lead section


 * 1) yes, it does
 * 2) yes, it does
 * no, it does not
 * 1) it's not overly detailed or not it's in the middle

content


 * 1) ye sit is
 * 2) ye sit was recently updated
 * no, it is not it just gives a brief outlook on street racing
 * 1) yes, it is

tone and balance


 * 1) yes, it is
 * 2) some said on the talk page that it was one spot on kin the article where a certain form of racingnot it idoes was not street racing
 * no, it is not
 * 1) yes, it is
 * 2) no it does not

sources and references


 * 1) yes, it is
 * 2) yes, it gives in sight on specific topics of the article and area
 * 3) most of them
 * 4) yes
 * 5) there are a lot of sources that could go into the article
 * 6) yes, the links work

organization and writing quality


 * 1) yes, it is gives good information on the topic.
 * no, it does not
 * 1) yes, it is

images and media


 * 1) yes, it does
 * 2) yes, it is
 * 3) yes
 * 4) yes

talk page discussion


 * 1) just things that some people may not agree with in the article and giving more feedback on the topic
 * 2) yes, it is
 * 3) we haven't talked about this topic in class

overall impression


 * 1) 8/10
 * 2) giving a somewhat clear view on the topic
 * 3) but more people giving different opinions on their form of street racing
 * 4) it's in the middle it has some good point to it

Which article are you evaluating?
(Provide a link to the article here.)

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)