User:MacSar.04/Lucila Villaseñor Grijalva/JazzyLinx Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

MacSar.04


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:MacSar.04/Lucila Villaseñor Grijalva


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * User:MacSar.04/Lucila Villaseñor Grijalva

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

CONTENT

Your content was up to date and relevant. It does a great job of presenting a topic that is not heavily known. You demonstrated an extensive amount of research concerning this topic.

TONE AND BALANCE

You were successful in presenting a neutral and well balanced research. Your writing was a direct presentation of facts and clearly showed it was not biased.

 SOURCES

Looking through your sources I noticed they were from a variety of authors which was great. Additionally, they were all current and reliable sources. It was an appropriate selection because they spanned from library sources to sources that are often underrepresented but that were great for this topic. I especially liked the interview you incorporated for research.

ORGANIZATION

The structure was concise and clear. It definitely flowed well and made sense.

NEW ARTICLES

The information was presented in an unbiased manner and pulled from neutral sources. There were no links to any other articles present. Perhaps you could add a link through editing the Wikipedia article on "Willie Herron." I noted there was a page on him so perhaps adding your artist to his page would help create more exposure.

Overall this page was very informational and a good read!