User:Macerpa/Evaluate an Article

Poverty Law
I have chosen this stub article because there is not much information, and I have academic resources that can flesh out the dynamics behind poverty law.

This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.

Lead


The lead only has a brief intro paragraph of what poverty law actually is, there is no historical contextualization or further details that explain the real world situation.

Content

 * Guiding questions

The content that is currently on the stub article is accurate, however, it is severely lacking.

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions

The article is indeed neutral, there are no biased claims, but there is an underrepresentation of the programs geared towards the poverty stricken demographics in California.

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions

The intro paragraph is accurate, for the most part, but there are no sources or resources that justify any of the information that is currently present on the stub article. All of the hyperlinks work.

Organization

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions
 * There is nothing on the talk page

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions


 * What is the article's overall status?
 * What are the article's strengths?
 * How can the article be improved?
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed?

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback: