User:MaddiMcg/Conversion disorder/Michellevp16 Peer Review

General info
MaddiMcg
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:MaddiMcg/Conversion disorder
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Conversion disorder

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead

The first sentence of the article, in my opinion, did not define what conversion disorder is. I believe I would switch the second sentence with the first sentence. "Conversion disorder (CD), or functional neurologic symptom disorder, is a condition in which a person experiences neurological symptoms and problems, such as, numbness,...". After the first sentence, I would then address that the disorder is in a diagnostic category used in psychiatric classification systems. I would also recommend fixing some wording. For example, "It is thought that..." could be cut out and changed to "Symptoms may arise..." which would make the lead seem more professional. Other than that, the lead appears to be clear and concise in which the common person can comprehend.

Content and Source/References

As to the content of the article, the article is clearly well structured. The article does seem up to date. With references from the early 2000s, I would recommend looking to into the possibilities into any new treatments.

Tone and Balance

The article is neutral. The articles claims do not appear biased. Additionally, the article does not have a particular viewpoint. The content of the article provides the reader with a neutral stand point.

Organization

As previously mentioned, the article is well structured and clearly presented. I do not see any major grammar or spelling issues. Nonetheless, I would recommend looking in more detail. Additionally, I would rephrase certain sentences to sound more confident and more professional sounding.

Images and Media

Although images are not essential, I believe this article could possible benefit from more images. I would recommend images in the history section perhaps even the treatment and diagnosis sections.

Overall, the two comments in the sandbox from the user do seem to improve the overall quality of the article. I would recommend taking my suggestions in account. I strongly encourage the user to review any grammar and wording in order to strengthen the article.