User:Maddiedufault/End Overdose Non-Profit/Isdewell Peer Review

General info
Maddie Dufault
 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Does not exist.
 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Maddiedufault/End Overdose Non-Profit
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * There is no lead. Article could benefit from a short overview at the top to give the reader context.

Content
Guiding questions


 * The content added is relevant to the topic.
 * The content added up-to-date.
 * There isn't any content that does not belong.
 * The article somewhat deals with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps or address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * The content added is fairly neutral though seems slightly in favor of End Overdose.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * The content added does not necessarily attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * None of the information is linked or referenced. All information used in the article must be cited.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * The content added is well-written, though it could be more concise.
 * There does not appear to be any grammatical or spelling errors.
 * The content added well-organized.

Images and Media

 * There are no images or media.
 * Adding media would be helpful to the reader.

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is for a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * The article appears to be supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject, but need to be referenced in the article.
 * The is not currently a list of sources.
 * The article follows the patterns of other similar articles for the most part, though it does not contain any necessary and infobox or lead.
 * The article does not link to other articles so it is more discoverable.

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * The article is a very strong start to a Wikipdedia page. It is a very comprehensive over view of the history of End Overdose.
 * The strengths of the content added includes the year by year history of the organization, the mission portion, as well as the overview of the founding member. Just be reviewing it I learned a lot.
 * The article needs a lead and references and links. This will ensure that the information you used is not plagiarized in any way. It will also make the article more discoverable to other readeres.