User:Maddiedufault/End Overdose Non-Profit/Skelley01 Peer Review

General info
Maddiedufault
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Maddiedufault/End Overdose Non-Profit - Wikipedia:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
Hi! I think it's super cool that you are writing a brand-new article from scratch! You have clearly done some great research and your statistics are super thorough!

I would recommend adding a lead section to your article. Currently, it just dives into the mission and values section without a general overview of the topic which would be beneficial to an outside reader.

Another big thing I would add to your article is citing your sources directly. I can see in your bibliography that you have several sources, but none of them are cited in the article. From what I can see, it's unclear where you are getting your information from. I would also recommend linking to other articles on Wikipedia wherever relevant, such as the colleges you've listed.

I like how you've added several subheadings, but I think the overall organization would look better if you used the underlined headings rather than just bolding the headings. Every heading and subheading being bolded makes the overall article kind of confusing and hard to follow.

I think your new article meets the notability requirement since I see that you have 3 sources outside the official website. It would be clearer that the subject is notable if I could see what information was coming from the secondary sources and what information was coming from the primary sources.

You have definitely improved the article since one didn't exist before and I think a few simple citations and formatting changes would make it even stronger!

Also, before you finalize the article, make sure to do a final read through for typos, I noticed one in University of Florida on your list of programs.