User:Maddiemohon/History of smallpox in Mexico/Hannahah01 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Maddiemohon


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Maddiemohon/History of smallpox in Mexico
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * History of smallpox in Mexico

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead:


 * 1) It appears as if the lead has been edited.
 * 2) It is concise with enough introductory information.

Content:


 * 1) The content is relevant and up to date.

Tone:


 * 1) The tone is neutral and impartial, it does not appear to be persuasive to any side of an argument.

Organization:


 * 1) This is very organized and easy to follow.
 * 2) Sections regarding the history, an introduction, an outbreak during the colonial period, and eradication efforts have been edited and/or added, which has made the article more informative and helps it flow better.

Sources:


 * 1) All of the information is backed up by reliable sources.
 * 2) There is a lot of information added but only two sources, I think it would be beneficial to add one or two more sources from a reliable secondary source like a peer reviewed journal.

Overall Impressions: This is a great article with a lot of important new information. It was easy to read, and I especially liked the eradication section. My suggestion would be to add a few more sources to back up your claims, since you have a lot of information but only two new sources in the bibliography. Other than that, great work!