User:Maddiet37/Centruroides hentzi/BellaW1102 Peer Review

General info
Maddiet37
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Maddiet37/Centruroides hentzi
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):NA

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead - The lead is very strong, and clearly defines the article. The lead outlines majority of what the article covers and is not too overly detailed.

Content - The added content is all relative to the topic and well written. The sources are all peer reviewed and up to date. There were also multiple sources meaning that there was lots of research done for the article. One thing that could possibly be worked on (if the information is available) is add more details to the diet section. Maybe add how they catch prey, or how often/much they eat. If the information is available, adding stuff on reproduction could also be valuable to the article!

Tone and Balance - The content is neutral and clearly written with no bias.

Sources and References - All information in the article is backed up by sources. Each source is reliable and peer reviewed, as well as up to date.

Organization - The content is well organized as well as easy to read. This is a new article, and the author does a good job with formatting in a similar pattern to other wikipedia pages

Images - The article doesn't have any images currently, but it may be beneficial to add a couple of the species!

Overall Impression - Overall this article is well written and organized with many reliable sources. A few things could be added to the diet section to make it more complete, as well as possibly adding details about reproduction if the information is available. Photos would also be beneficial to add to make the article more complete.