User:Maddy On/Evaluate an Article

- Clinical physiology

- I have chosen to evaluate this article because the publisher is clear and concise to the subject. Moreover, I find the practice compelling and crucial in rehabilitating individuals back to health, physically, as much as mentally.

- Upon visiting the article, I concluded that the thesis is present and clearly states the focus of the article. The lead briefly includes the substance of each paragraph presented further in the article.

- The content is relevant to the topic in case, however, the publisher should reevaluate the "History" section of the article and add more information as it lacks important information, or the information presented is not enough with respect to the study and evolution of Clinical Physiology. This section presents information that lacks citations and therefore reliability is dismissed, as it is also discussed in the Talk page.

- The publisher does not intend to persuade readers, but rather educate the readers on the topic.

- Citations incorporated are not satisfactory; the publisher should consider adding more academic references to reinforce the article.

- Adding images to an article makes it stand out, and presenting a well-written article that includes relevant images adds value to the experience of the reader. This article does not include any images. The use of images could really amplify the experience for visual learners, as well as generally assist in better processing of information for all readers.