User:Maddydowling27/Resistbot/Justin.tsubasa Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Maddydowling27


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Talk:Resistbot

Evaluate the drafted changes
My peer review regards what is added on the talk page, as I did not see anything in the sand box.

- In the first section, the statement "What stands out about Resistbot is the fact that it is convenient to use and voices concerns instantaneously." is overtly on the side of resistbot, and could be turned into a more neutral statement.

- From what you have in the comparison of views section, it appears that you are leaning to describe the positive impacts of resistbot despite its negative spotlight, but in order to ensure that the article remains neutral, information that describe its negative effects/attributes would be beneficial.

- The information put is well constructed, but from reading your contributions it feels that you are trying to persuade the reader to be in favor of resistbot, by removing this tone the article would be well constructed without any bias.