User:Maddyheymann/Catherine Flon/Alexjacullo Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Maddyheymann


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Catherine Flon
 * Catherine Flon

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The lead section is probably fine as it is; it's concise but informative and gives an introductory overview of who Flon is and why she is important. It also includes an overview of the article's sections that follow.

Content definitely addresses an equity gap, especially considering she is a female figure of historical significance, particularly in a smaller country that is not often focused on in the course of historical events. I think the content currently there now is relevant, but it is very short and could be more expansive and well-developed. For example, the article mentions Flon's influence on aspects of Haitian culture and I think it could be a good idea to list out some of the explicit examples of this influence such as the "social events and women-led activist movements." I'm not sure if it would be possible to find accurate and reliable information regarding her background and early life, but that could be a great way to add to the article as well.

As for tone, the article appears pretty neutral and unbiased. Due to the relative lack of abundance of content, it's not all that possible to ascertain whether certain viewpoints are overrepresented or underrepresented. Also, no persuasive element seems to be present.

It doesn't look like all of the content currently in the article is cited to a source. Also, there are only 3 sources, so I doubt this best reflects the amount of information available on the subject of the article. The cited sources also do not appear to be very current. There is only one source that has a link, which works.

I definitely feel as though the article could be better written overall and more well-developed. I think the organization is a bit strange, but that could be due to the lack of information in the article to begin with.

More images could definitely help, such as images of Flon herself or other contextual images relating to her role in Haitian history.