User:Maddywhit24/Weather and climate/Shadowknight1109 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Im reviewing User: Maddywhit24 and their work on Weather and Climate. User:Maddywhit24/sandbox

Lead evaluation
The lead states what will be talked about in the chosen subtopic and it is clear and concise. However it talks about mountain ranges, wind, and sea currents which is not stated in the article.

Content evaluation
The content added is relevant to the topic and up to date. Content missing is any information about how mountains, wind, and sea currents affect weather and climate.

Tone and balance evaluation
The content is neutral with no bias present anywhere on the article.

Sources and references evaluation
The content is backed up by the sources and all the links work well. 1-2 of the sources may be a little outdated/has very little info (a paragraph or two) about the topic in question.

Organization evaluation
The content is clear and easy to read with minor grammatical/spelling errors.

Images and media evaluation
No added images/media.

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?

Overall evaluation
Overall the content added has improved the quality of the article yet it only touched on the information that could be added. It could be improved more by including more information other than latitudes&longitudes or perhaps going into more depth about the different climates instead.