User:Madeleine.olive/ONONDAGA HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION/AntonioVLCruz Peer Review

General info
Madeleine.olive
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Madeleine.olive/ONONDAGA HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead

The lead introduces the topic in a clear, unbiased, and concise manner while simultaneously displaying cultural significance and culture in its description.

Content

The information is spare, however all content provided is relevant to the topic of the article, cited well and described concisely yet descriptively.

Tone and Balance

The tone of the article is neutral and educational. In terms of balance, lots of emphasis was placed on the museums part, and listing all hours of each place might lose the attention of a reader.

Sources and References

All content that is referenced in this article is cited with linked material that provides context on the topic.

Organization

Information is loosely organized, however, accounting the lack of volume of content, organization is satisfactory for the page. If adding more information in the future, I'd love to see more sections offering more content about what exactly they've done in terms of projects.

Overall

This article is concise, informational, and clear. The only things I would add would come with more information, so if more research was conducted I believe this article could look even better.