User:Madelineutter13/Rain Man/Madelineutter13 Peer Review

Great additions to the article! I love how you described the production and all of the background work that went into the creating of the film. Some ideas that I have are: it might not be necessary to list the people who were offered involvement in the film but turned it down (like Mickey Rourke), the paragraph describing how Hoffman learned to portray someone with Savant Syndrome seems a little disorganized - maybe it would be better to include how it led to a misunderstanding by the public about Autism and Savant Syndrome at the end of the paragraph?, and maybe all of the information about the physical photography and videography should be an entire separate paragraph? The lead is great! I know you're updating what's already there, but your leads for the paragraphs you have are clear and concise, and inform the reader of what's to come in the rest of the paragraph. Your content is very interesting, and since the original page doesn't have much about the physical production of the film, I think your additions are very relevant. Your use of sources is also great! I love the variety and they're all respected sources. Overall I loved the things you added, and I think this definitely adds relevant information to the article! ~ Madeline

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)