User:MadiSalinas1/Rapids/RaBailBail Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

MadiSalinas1


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:MadiSalinas1/sandbox


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Rapids

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

It would be helpful to see where you would place the information within the context of the article, perhaps underlining the information that you added.

I like that you linked information within your additions to other relevant articles, this makes your article more accessible.

Your sources seem more or less up to date, but I wonder if there are more recent sources you could add as well.

Good choice on published works that are credible. Both links tried also worked.

I also think there is more information you could find on this topic to make it more complete, for example rapids ecology or species found in rapids.

Your grammar was good.

Viewpoint was neutral

Other useful information might include the source of rapids, or what causes them.

If you wanted, you could even add an image of rapids to help illustrate what they look like.

Overall, your additions contained relevant information. Good work!