User:MadisonOliver7/Hexactinellid/Caylee.lynn Peer Review

General info
MadisonOliver7
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:MadisonOliver7/Hexactinellid:

Evaluate the drafted changes
Overall I think that the information added was well thought out and delivered well. The overall flow of information & headings could probably be changed to read Biology, Reefs, Conservation and then Hasari to make the overall page read smoother. Additionally for formatting, the last sentence of conservation needs to be un italicized.

The second sentence in the conservation paragraph seems unclear on the purpose in conservation impact. The information probably needs to be joined into another sentence somehow to make it flow better.

All of your sources look to be reputable and useable however they are missing a few items like titles and dates.

The content does not seem to be biased in any way, I would maybe just try to find another example of conservation of these reefs if you can.

(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)