User:Madison Luzar/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Trade Justice

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I feel that this article is very relevant to my PE org's main purpose. It should give a good comprehensive overview of the history of the sector and current politics surrounding international trade.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

Lead Section
The first half of the lead section is good, it does a good job of summing up the general arguments of trade justice advocates. But the wording becomes a little unclear later on; there are a couple of errors and the content seems a bit unfocused and concise.

Content
This article does not do a very deep dive into the topic, and the content is somewhat disorganized. It talks about a lot of relevant topics within the trade justice movement, but they are a bit scattered and could be reorganized to flow better.

Tone and Balance
I did not feel that this article was imbalanced at all. It does a good job maintaining a neutral tone and presenting the arguments of advocates as they are without a particular bias.

Sources and References
The citations seem to be a bit lacking. There are several sentences that require citations which are not cited, and only six sources are cited here.

Organization and Writing Quality
The article is organized fine with how little information is presented, but it could probably be organized better once more information is added it. The writing quality is confusing at times and could be edited a bit.

Images and Media
The image does not do much to enhance understanding, but it is appropriate and captioned.

Talk Page Discussion
There are hardly any conversations in the talk page, only one interesting discussion about adding a "criticisms of" section which has yet to be done.

This article is listed under four Wikiprojects: Wikiprojects Africa, Wikiprojects Agriculture, Wikiprojects International Relations, Wikiprojects Trade. For all of them, the article is rated as "Start."

Overall Impressions
Overall, this article is pretty weak and could use a lot more details and structure. There is a lot more work to be done to make this article sufficiently informative about this topic. It could probably use more sections, history of significant events, and discussion about current debates. It could especially use more clarity in the areas of how trade justice overlaps with the free trade movement but is distinct in its framings, strategies, and actions.