User:Madisonmosher/Social media/Abswag2121 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
There's a strong lead because it's clear, concise, and straight-forward. There are a lot of technical references within the article but they were explained which is wise. I feel like there are parts in the article that could more simplified. I also think more there could be more in-depth or more text added in the beginning portion so the fourth paragraph where it starts by saying, "Social media outlets differ from social media..." there could be more added at the end of this paragraph/section. It ends abruptly and so may be you could offer more distinctions between non-traditional/traditional media since that's what's primarily being discussed. Also, the sentences after this paragraph there could be more added here. It's very brief and could talk further about the rhetoric within the digital world.