User:Madisonnew/Western bluebird/32Dugg Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Madisonnew


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Madisonnew/Western_bluebird?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Western bluebird

Evaluate the drafted changes
The article does a very good job of explaining how noise inadvertently affects the population of the Western bluebird. I was very impressed with how you were able to make this connection. My only suggestion to the article would be that you should define “These species interactions” just to avoid confusion. By defining this, it would be easier for the flow of the article. I like how in this article you address the differences in Western blue bird population among geographical locations. I could expand on this in my own article.

There aren’t any headings present in the sandbox, so it is a little difficult to determine where exactly you will be placing this information in the actual Wikipedia article. I am also unable to assess whether or not this paragraph is placed in a good section of the Wikipedia article. Overall, the excerpt is in a decent length and is of equal importance to the rest of the article. Nothing appears to be off topic. This excerpt does not draw conclusions and is objective for the most part. It explains specifically why there are differences in the Western blue bird population. I would probably remove the word “likely” from the last sentence, just so that it doesn’t seem as though you are trying to convince the audience of this relationship. All statements in the article come from a reliable source and both are highly credible. In addition, the article is evenly composed of data from both sources.