User:Madisonroberts97/Conservation and restoration of new media art/Drpencil9 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Madisonroberts97


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Madisonroberts97/Conservation_and_restoration_of_new_media_art?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Conservation and restoration of new media art

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead

The editor did not make any additional information to the lead section of this article. Will this be something that you will be contributing to in your draft? I don't know that it is necessary to copy the lead paragraph over if you are not going to be making changes to it.

Content

The edition of the sections in Preservation tools, brings new information into the already present article. The editor is simply making an addition to an already existing article with recent and relevant information. The information added depth to the topic and is useful for research.

Tone and Balance

The tone and balance of the article are neutral and give an unbiased description. It provides academic information and sources to the additional information. The information gives clarity to the preexisting article.

Sources and References

The bibliography appears to function and are updated appropriately. However, the citations have been moved around and changed and don't link specifically to the references that were cited in the original text. It is only a draft but remember to attach these before publishing.

Organization

The editor created additional headings for this section under the topic and was broken up into easy-to-read paragraphs.

Images and Media

No images or media as been added to the article as of yet. Perhaps a photograph of the people working on conservation and restoration or someone who was a key asset in its development.

Overall Impressions

I like how the editor chose relevant information. So much has changed since the original posting of the first article. It's not easy working on a preexisting article, your contributions are appreciated. ~ Drpencil9 (talk) 16:25, 10 November 2021 (UTC)