User:Madisonrockw18/Beignet/Priscaumba Peer Review

General info
Madisonrockw18
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Madisonrockw18/Beignet
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Beignet

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

I think you did a wonderful job adding information for the types section. You gave more relevant information and described it well to fit into the tone of the previous writer. All of this made it flow and added good information to the article. I would possibly add more about the types and the variations. A brief description is important and then you can add the link for readers to explore more. I would say not to delete the other types written rather than growing it more.

If there are other styles of beignet, it would be important to mention them and not simply focus on Louisiana. The origins can grow and be more in-depth to give clarity to all aspects of history. The preparations section can use some brief explanations, but it is no big deal if not. The links should be enough, but making sure all of them have one is beneficial.

The grammar and spelling is good. The sources are legitimate and give a good amount of information. The article is going well and looking forward to seeing how it is improved.