User:Madnel4/Gestalt psychology/Spenn7 Peer Review

General info
User:Madnel4/Gestalt psychology/Spenn7 Peer Review.
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Madnel4/Gestalt psychology
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Gestalt psychology

Evaluate the drafted changes
In the lead paragraph, I think you could have added more factual and relevant sentences to the article instead of the sentence you inserted about it being plagiarized. Besides this, I believe the lead paragraph is good, and stays on topic while explaining stimuli and its role in Gestalt psychology. I believe the content was very neutral and not biased, and the formatting was clear and easy to read. My only critique is that you could have added better content to the article to where it improved the overall quality and made the lead paragraph stronger. I think your article could be improved by adding some sentences on why stimulus are attributable to the systematic arrangement according to Gestalt principles.