User:Madra2019/sandbox

N v Health Service Executive, [2006] IESC 60, [2006] 4 IR 374, was an  Irish Supreme Court   case  overruling the High Court's decision to maintain the custody of 'Baby Ann ' with her adoptive parents. The Supreme Court held that the constitutional integrity of the natural and marital family outweighed bonding and attachment between the child and her adoptive parents pursuant to Article 40.4.2 of the Constitution.

Infobox, located at the right of the article in its own box (this is 'sub-heading 1')
''Every Irish Supreme Court case should use the infobox court case template. This can be the last part to add to your article. When you are in edit mode you can click on the infobox and select edit or you can use "edit source" to add information. If you have any trouble with the infobox post a message on the Moodle discussion forum asking for help. DO LAST''

Facts and adoption history
Ann was placed in the custody of Mr. and Mrs. Doyle with a view to adoption. Mr. and Mrs Byrne who are the birth parents of baby Ann now seek to obtain custody pursuant to Article 40.4.2 of the Constitution. to do

Mrs Byrne was pre

- prior birth baby ann parents students in early twenties

- couple A not advise their own parents of decision

baby put for adoption to couple B

after 18 months couple A withdrew consent

Subsections may include history, facts of the case, procedural history or lower courts (or even a subsection for each lower court, appropriately titled), and petition (for certiorari). You can cite the judgement when you are summarizing the facts of the case.

Oral arguments can go at the end of this section if you choose the "Opinion of the Court" style (see full explanation below).

Ruling in the High Court
The High Court directed that Baby Ann remains in the custody of her adoptive parents as a strong bond was already well established.

Holding of the Supreme Court
This section should contain a summary of the Court's opinion as well as any important events of note that occurred during the case. Use this section for excerpts from the decision and precedents cited.

Subsections or a paragraph for concurring and dissenting opinions can also be added as appropriate. Should be in the form of "Concurrences" and "Dissents" for section headers.

The Supreme Court at a sitting of five, unanimously allowed the appeal of the natural parents of baby Ann. The Supreme Court recognized a constitutional presumption that Ann's Welfare would be best achieved in the custody of her natural parents.

It was also established that the strong bond between the infant and her adoptive parents did not constitute a sufficient standard to dismiss the custody of Ann and her natural parents.

Subsequent developments
This is an optional section. Whether your article has it or not depends on the sources you find on Westlaw IE.Cases that clarify/reverse; relevant developments for the parties or dispute (outcome of remand/"Nixon turned over his tapes..."), social effects. Be sure to include citations in support of any claim you make here about the case's subsequent impact.

Refer forward to subsequent cases citing this decision as precedent.

Infobox, located at the right of the article in its own box (this is 'sub-heading 1')
Every Irish Supreme Court case should use the infobox court case template. This can be the last part to add to your article. When you are in edit mode you can click on the infobox and select edit or you can use "edit source" to add information. If you have any trouble with the infobox post a message on the Moodle discussion forum asking for help.

What belongs here:
This section includes facts of the dispute, its history in lower courts, and relevant historical/political context. Subsections may include history, facts of the case, procedural history or lower courts (or even a subsection for each lower court, appropriately titled), and petition (for certiorari). You can cite the judgement when you are summarizing the facts of the case.

Oral arguments can go at the end of this section if you choose the "Opinion of the Court" style (see full explanation below).

Holding of the Supreme Court
This section should contain a summary of the Court's opinion as well as any important events of note that occurred during the case. Use this section for excerpts from the decision and precedents cited.

Subsections or a paragraph for concurring and dissenting opinions can also be added as appropriate. Should be in the form of "Concurrences" and "Dissents" for section headers.

Subsequent developments
This is an optional section. Whether your article has it or not depends on the sources you find on Westlaw IE.Cases that clarify/reverse; relevant developments for the parties or dispute (outcome of remand/"Nixon turned over his tapes..."), social effects. Be sure to include citations in support of any claim you make here about the case's subsequent impact.

Refer forward to subsequent cases citing this decision as precedent.