User:Madsngo/White coffee/Savula98 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? Madsngo
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Madsngo/White coffee

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
 * Yes, it's very specific talking about the difference between white coffee by color or by the process by which it's made.
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * In stating the "white coffee has become the new coffee of the United States" it clearly and concisely describes the article's topic. Maybe it can expand to facts & figures to prove that white coffee has been growing in popularity in the United States.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * Yes, it talks about the differences between white coffee around the world and also the process of which it's made.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * No, it covers everything that's in the article.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?
 * Yes, it's adds more to the article.
 * Is the content added up-to-date?
 * Yes.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * Could expand more about trends in United States.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral?
 * Yes.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * No.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Everything works with the article, very concise and to the point.
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
 * No.

Tone and balance evaluation
I was impressed by the tone being consistently neutral throughout the article. The only input I'd really say is to add more about trends in the United States and why it's been popularized.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Yes.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Sources are thorough, maybe more information on different countries/ add more countries?
 * Are the sources current?
 * Yes.
 * Check a few links. Do they work?
 * Yes.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Yes, very clear and well organized.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * No.
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
 * Yes. Maybe seperate more in the countries and be more specific.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Yes, she did a great job at this!
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Yes.
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Yes.
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?
 * Yes.

Images and media evaluation
I think you did a great job using media to enhance your article - I was wondering what white beans looked like in the previous stub class article! So that was a smart thing to add.

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
 * Yes.
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
 * Not too many articles are listed, but I think they were good sources to find the information needed to expand on this topic.
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
 * Yes.
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?
 * Yes.

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * I feel like that's as much as you can really expand on this topic. Besides maybe talking about trends as well as adding more countries to the list. Maybe expand more on different creamers used?
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * Great job at being neutral.
 * How can the content added be improved?
 * Mentioned above.

Overall evaluation
I think this article was interesting and informative. She did a great job at having a neutral tone throughout the article.