User:Magdiabdalrazig

Explanations of the theory of terrorism
By; Magdi abdalrazig Research follow in Israel and terrorism

Terrorism is a word I hesitated a lot in recent years have become commonplace for inductive degree of intoxication, making it imposes itself on the literature and novels when peoples and nations, especially after the attacks of September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. In this regard, we find that both touched on the subject of terrorism and accept its history, its causes and definitions noted that there is not a single text confirming the agreed-upon know the word terrorism is consistent with the fact, where we come back to some obvious defects in the definition, and the ratio of the fundamental problems in research techniques for terrorism, Add to the apparent lack of systematic terror and extreme difficulty in finding theoretical frameworks for self-analysis of this phenomenon. This of course does not prove lack of attention to the issue of terrorism and its spread, there is a tremendous amount of specialized magazines and institutions of intellectual, scientific, has focused on the locus of terrorism in all its aspects, was studied this phenomenon by specialists from various fields such as political science and international relations and criminology, psychology and even history and theology and psychiatry and other humanities, has hired some research institutions, some utilities to increase knowledge about terrorism, in addition to some of the studies presented on this topic in order to get out of the issue of Muslim theory, which allowed me to see that there are many differences, such as the focus on terror In search operations, the number of searches in political science on terror goes far beyond what is in search of Criminology, as well as the issue of how to address this problem, if terrorism into political science is a form of irregular warfare or conventional is that it has approached the definition crime, which is considered a form of political crime. It is clear that current theories in traditional disciplines can provide some interesting ideas about this phenomenon in spite of suffering for not exceeding the extent of definitions and explanations summary for this topic phenomenon, they are addressing only certain aspects of the problem of terrorism and does not provide an analytical framework that would address the problem fundamentally. Terrorism as a subject of study cannot be more difficult to understand, but maybe there is some development of management theory and methodology for terrorism, if we want to dig deeper on the circuit analytical theory may not be our ability to get out of this vicious circle of terrorism and the concept definition, this vicious circle is not only to prevent the academic community in the emergence of concepts and methods applied directly to the phenomenon of terrorism, but they also interfere in the decision-making and decision-makers who are in a state of intense pressure to make decisions regarding the act or event with regard to terrorism, in the presence of theory incomplete, inaccurate or ineffective, Therefore, it is incumbent upon us to consider the audit and concentration in the various studies on terrorism, in which the correct scientific. If we look to the countries of the international community we find she has been a deviation in the nature of the policies related to the implementation practices of procedural systems to control operations and to deter terrorism, it has become terror of the priorities of states and an integral part of the policies we find democracy based on a policy of deterrence described generally in all aspects of life under the pretext of the fight against terrorism and thus have missed a lot of regulation and supervision of legal them, the we were to support the actions and behaviors of political towards this phenomenon is the result of what proved the weakness and inability to organize the international legal law and criminal law particularities to contain the phenomenon of terrorism, definitions and frameworks different, they have shown us the limited legal mechanisms which strove where treaties and agreements deterrent to terrorism for approval and consolidation and activate its role, as a result of the lack of will Avenue of the States of the commitment and application as well as the decline of the active role the box below for the organization of the international community (the United Nations) and some international and regional organizations, in addition to the initiative of some major countries that dominate the area to deter terrorism and recruitment of those phenomenon for the purpose and the interest of some of the agendas and concepts and those countries that seek to apply and enforce policy and hegemony internationally and regionally. This deviation of the nature of deterrence policy of the States in the fight against terrorism, the most prominent of several negative trends, including: -1 The transformation deal of the framework of the legal regulation of the Convention between countries through the mechanism of international treaties and agreements to sub-system binding authoritarian compulsive States embodies us those formulas negative in the fight against terrorism shall be our mandatory formula counter-terrorism system-level deterrent International, whether through the direct intervention of the Council of Security or through binding decisions of the states on the basis of the activation materials VI and VII of the Charter of the United Nations, including the promise of many of the procedures and measures in the field of deterring terrorism, in addition to grab the major countries and a strong right of direct action and immediate intervention to deter terrorism surpassing the powers of the Security Council itself, which form formula vehicle hybrid system of deterrence of international terrorism, which led to the decline of the sharp decline of the role of the United Nations as public as a body of an international dispute resolution issues and to recover the rights of the people which led declining role internationalist to regulate the legal frameworks and diplomacy and coordination of efforts and cooperation between Member States with regard to terrorism and the declining role of UN organization as a result of the hegemony of superpowers valuable administration and management and leadership policy of deterrence international counter-terrorism, which has not yet succeeded in defining the concept, so I tried the International Organization to find an assessment of its current role as an organization in general and the role that should be looked by the Security Council in particular Also find that there are efforts to highlight the formula forced to deter and combat the so-called international terrorism, through the emphasis on the illegality of the issue of singling out and control and domination of some major countries and strong leadership, management and policy guidance deterrent to combat terrorism, and so out of their own concepts and policies of unilateralism. On the other hand, we find that the current role of the United Nations is characterized by irony characterized by a peculiar product of the secretions of the developments of events and facts of international political, which began to be formed since the early nineties of the last century and are these anomalies in the decline in the role of the United Nations as an effective and balanced in dealing with files such as counter-terrorism, this the role is a role ignorance and weak as a result of the emergence of a dominant UN Security Council, which showed the Security Council appearance owner agendas own as it hides the real role of the great powers and the window in the Security Council, making the international community looks to the Security Council glance Council biased and unstable, a natural product of the weakness and marginalization of the role of UN organization in the field of counter-terrorism, in addition to not seeking a precise definition of international terrorism be the subject of agreement and consensus of all Member States an important part in the nature of the relationship of terrorism and the international community, which led to an imbalance in the concepts and theories of the calendar is moderate and equitable for the elements and criteria that determine the legality of studies and behaviors of political violence in various parts of the world. This shows the imbalance and lack of balance in the organization's policy to combat terrorism through the document transmitted to the Secretary-General of the United Nations... of the General Assembly and the Security Council after being prepared by a working group specialist, came in the note (some policies relating to the United Nations in the field of counter-terrorism) also highlighted this document number of the gaps in the methodology and the organization's policy concerning is seeking hard to deter crime and political violence threatening international peace and security, and between these gaps, we find, for example: the effects resulting from the use of this type of political violence and Mil (terrorism), while it was better for the start of the reasons and the motives behind it terrorist act, as well as the document was not exposed to the legitimate right of resistance for independence and liberation from colonial and authoritarian regimes and racism. Add to all of this, we find that the document did not strive hard to find a precise and comprehensive definition of terrorism, as we note that the working group that prepared the document and select the organization's policy in the fight against terrorism has acknowledged that the role of the organization remain very limited in this area and is linked primarily the cooperation of states and organizations in terms of resources material and logistical organization can be obtained from the Member States. In spite of the limited and poor role and contribution of the international organization in the field of counter-terrorism, but we find that the role that the orders of the organization finally to the Security Council in the follow-up and implementation of all acts of international terrorism is the most important and effective though it lacks the lack of stability and consistency of the legal and regulatory, as well as that power of attorney or authorization is aggressive and overcome barriers and legal powers, often as the result of the dominance of the major powers on the council, guidance and interpretation of policy to deal with it as consistent with the interests of those states, independent so the powers of the Security Council in the right to issue binding decisions of the Member States or other private decisions related to the occurrence of cases of aggression or other threats to the state and that under the name of maintaining international peace and security. If we reviewed the many Security Council resolutions on the issue of deterring terrorism in the past decades, we find that the Council was a trumpet, who graduated from votes decisions without even interference from him on the subject of deterring terrorism only through some references to some previous resolutions denouncing and condemning in which some aspects of terrorism and violence. the world among which the practices of international terrorism, and what more can we give to interventions and posts of the Security Council in resolutions supported and directed by the major powers is what has been convicted and condemnation of the practices of a number of countries toward some countries through the mechanism of the use of those states of military force as a non- legitimacy. At the end of the nineties of the last century and the beginning of the current millennium, we find that the Security Council issued new decisions were the subject of criticism and rejection of lawmakers legal and international experts were their views of legal addresses the issue exceeded the Security Council of its powers and the role ascribed to it as stated in the Charter of the United Nations and the example of this version Security Council for several decisions in the case of lockerbie against Libya and in favor of a three-nation strong and window enjoying permanent membership on the board, taking advantage of this Chapter VII of the Charter to condemn Libya and claims not to support terrorism and extradition of Libyans accused of committing those acts and terrorist crimes against the victims of lockerbie. The aspects of the dispute Method according to the views of legislators and jurists and politicians centered on (Security Council passed a resolution ordering the aggressor States or in violation of the obligations under international law to stop this assault or acts contrary to its international obligations), but for example, we find that resolution 731 issued against Libya is in fact compliance to the requests of the United States and Britain, Libya calls for judicial cooperation and extradition of its nationals wanted, these requests that have passed through the mechanism of the Security Council formed a new legal effects of the illegal acts of the Security Council and drawn, without his powers. Well, we find that in the March 21, 1992, the Security Council to exercise behavior procedurally wrong with stopping position unfairly biased in it for the benefit of Britain and America when it issued against Libya Resolution No. 748 in accordance with Chapter VII, which acknowledged the existence of the case of threats to the peace and security, especially after Libya refused and declined responding to the requests contained in resolution 731 which was considered legal flagrant bias of the Security Council in favor of one party or group of parties on the other two international surpassing the powers entrusted with forming and several violations of the law. Form that abuse and excess of powers and legal authorities by the Charter of UN corridor, paving the Security Council to take steps and procedural decisions wrong highlighted the seriousness and the positions of the Security Council resolutions on counter-terrorism, especially what it was issued in the wake of the latest September 11, 2001, issued Resolution No. 1373, which exceeded in importance and inclusion in all the taken from the international resolutions, but we can say that it has exceeded all signed agreement or international treaties on terrorism by the date, because it gave states the right and the legitimacy of the fight against terrorism and dealing with terrorist crimes directly without recourse to the Security Council, which came in the first part of the resolution text confirms Ali (the need to focus on the duty of States to prevent the financing of terrorist acts) and then came far too at length in the second part of the decision (to determine the duty of States and non-assistance to terrorist acts directly and indirectly) with the assurance to take action that would prevent persons or bodies carried out terrorist acts and the denial of asylum to the territory. The third part of the resolution has called for states to redouble their efforts in the exchange of information, especially with regard to work and the movements of terrorist networks and terrorists, as also demanded to join the treaties and agreements related to international terrorism and work to implement those treaties with modify all laws of the countries criminal in accordance with the international implications of the subject relevant in order to ensure the international community to engage in cooperation to combat terrorism and terrorist acts. This decision, which like a renewal of international law came as legislation in the field of terrorism and taking important commitments and binding on the states in the implementation without any restrictions, obligations which are considered immediate or with the authority of a top papal due as stated in previous agreements and other international treaties that have been passed by the Security Council under Chapters 25 - and 103 of the Charter, which form of behavior that is biased to the Security Council led to a deviation from the path specified his surpassing its legal authorities and that the instigation and direction of the state or states with the impact and influence in the Security Council, which is exactly what the saliva on the Security Council not to reconcile in the issuance of the 1338 On September 12, 2001 on the impact of the September 11 attacks, which interpreted the event as international terrorism and that terrorism threatens international peace and security with reference to give the right of individual states or groups to defend themselves and their country, has been marked by this decision some ambiguity and uncertainty in its meaning and its implications, especially when counting the interpretation and justification legitimize the war led by the United States against Afghanistan, which led to all-out war under the name of combating terrorism, under the cover of a UN implementation of what passed by the Security Council has the right to legitimate self-defense and homeland, this adaptation and justifications are in fact justifications lacking (patent ), which is adapted oscillating frequency expresses the Security Council and the weakness and lack of clarity in the evaluation mechanism of the matter and its implications, which in turn is an overall shortfall in the international legal regulation and the deficit in particular in the organization competent in the field of coun ter-terrorism. Terrorism is a phenomenon and work involving combat so as not to spread, but the international community has not yet been set dimensions and its contents, especially the Security Council as a body the focus of its response to this phenomenon, however, we find that all decisions relating to the fight against terrorism are particularly sensitive calls for the immediate implementation of them even without knowing states What action or terrorist act, which enter the plans to combat terrorism in the circle of suspicion that would target the stability of rules and sources of committed against the states under consideration, it is certain that all States are convinced of the need to combat terrorism, but in spite of that they are implementing the Security Council resolutions relevant to terrorism without any objection only out of fear of sanctions if you do not comply with them or in some cases for fear of America even accused of doing against military action on the pretext that it supports or harbors or adopt terrorism just as it did with Afghanistan and Iraq, Sudan, and many countries, either directly or indirectly, which urges us to emphasize the illegality of the conduct unilateral to some countries in the fight against terrorism, compared to what came in the Charter of the United Nations, which enshrines the collective security system of the state and not the security of a particular country, and the business and interventions unilateral countries on the pretext of the fight against terrorism would be forced by international law to find Treatment of the act (terrorism) and the reaction (to go to the power of the material) such as the use of military force against countries that adopt this approach to terrorism or supporting it, as the reaÁ نص كبير

نص العنوان
ction is often located outside the framework of international legitimacy, surpassing the rules of international law, especially the fourth paragraph of Article II of the Charter of the United Nations, which prohibits the use of force or the threat of threat in the relations between states, also noted that there are some major countries and powerful justify their behaviors to exercise diplomatic and economic pressure to the least of them the strength and size and allow itself to interfere in its internal affairs, if it deems it .. it is a justification under the pretext of deterrence policy practices and acts of terrorism which is exactly the reaction contrasts with what brought him the seventh paragraph of Article II of the United Nations Charter, which enshrines the principle of peaceful coexistence between states and the inadmissibility of interference in the internal affairs of member states, and is considered to respect this principle in theory is the respect for the sovereignty of nations and the application of the principle of equality in sovereignty between the states, but it is practically difficult to ensure respect for the sovereignty and evidence that as many as in Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya and in the way Syria and Iran, this is the application that is a matter for the lack of balance of power between the Member States of the United Nations is expressing a natural reflection of the conduct of international relations in its development or retreat. It is noted that these reflections passed often through legal means or through UN resolutions or through international treaties or in some cases as a result of the actions or unilateral decisions may come from some powerful countries or through regional organizations, the decisions and justifications for granting terrorism and terrorists and the countries supporting them powerful States and affected such as America and Britain in the practice of the behavior of the reaction and deal directly with the crimes of terrorism, which is the justification and behaviors made powerful states are working hard through the mechanisms of the United Nations to confer international legitimacy on their movements and their interaction to deter and combat all forms of terrorism, and also enabled these countries to take the means of individual and away from the decisions of the Security Council and various United Nations mechanisms, including that they can take measures and the imposition of sanctions, diplomatic, economic and trade as an expression of its policy of deterrence, which is known as (countermeasures), which is a two types of procedures, the initial procedures are in character preventive and deterrent seeks from which to pressure the State concerned the event deterrent, while the second procedure is conducting punitive in nature seeks from which to deter the act and punish direct and is considered one of the coercive measures and contrary to the normal rules of international law because it measures have been taken in violation of the law such as lack of commitment to the implementation of a legal duty or obligation contractual. These actions are contrary to the principle of seeking to resolve international disputes Anti-related copyright punitive as two sides, one is necessary to deter or fight against the state or by peaceful means as these actions should keep the administrative side in deterring and duties, while the other side, and most importantly highlights the seriousness of these actions to those countries that violate with their obligations in terms of the formula discretion in adapting terrorist acts and practices, and enable these dangerous specifically at the basis of its policy of deterrence imposed unilaterally can appear in making judgments and decisions based on the unilateral thought might make up the fabric of political considerations, these political considerations dye that control in international resolutions and the relations between the countries have been among some scholars politicians that these countries violate some of the fundamental rules of the law, which is absent from adaptations and precise legal stringent and thus violate the basic principles of the Charter of the United Nations, especially the principles on which the system of collective security and peaceful coexistence between peoples, and in the Therefore, we find that some States have adopted a similar approach within its borders approved deterrent systems to combat terrorism in violation of the procedural rules as well as some legal and general principles that have been devoted to the protection of human rights and public freedoms. Finally, we find that those countries which have to approach the strict and deterrent worked did not agree or reach an agreement so far on the nature of the thing that will not be deterred by each process deterrent labeling on behalf of terrorism without creating a clear explanation of the meaning of terrorism.

Magdi Osman abdalrazig Research follow in Israel and terrorism نص كبير