User:Maggie0715/Stay-at-home parent/AmayaHowell Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? (provide username) Maggie0715
 * Link to draft you're reviewing:

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? Yes, states what stay at home parents are responsible for.
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? Not finished yet
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? Has a brief understanding
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? Concise

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? Not all content is added quite yet
 * Is the content added up-to-date? Yes
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? Missing content
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics? No, common knowledge as of right now.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? It's well known.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Not quite yet
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? So far, yes
 * Are the sources current? N/A
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible? N/A
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Yes they work.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Yes
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? Not that I have seen.
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Not broken down yet, but a great start to the article.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? N/A
 * Are images well-captioned? N/A
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? N/A
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? N/A

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject? Just started
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject? Just started
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles? Just started
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable? Yes.

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? Not completed yet, but a good start.
 * What are the strengths of the content added? they list some examples of what stay-at-home parents would do for the household.
 * How can the content added be improved? Just finish the article with some strong sources.