User:Maggiehance/sandbox

Article Evaluation: Contemporary Art

Evaluating Content


 * 1) Everything in the article was relevant to the topic.
 * 2) Some of the sources were over 10 years old, but most were pretty up to date.
 * 3) There is not really anything in this article that sticks out to me that should be improved.

Evaluating Tone


 * 1) This article does a good job of staying neutral and explains contemporary art very well. There is nothing that is said that makes me think a writer is biased.
 * 2) I think more could be added to the "Public Attitudes" section because I believe that the way the public reacts to art is of more importance than is seen in this article.

Evaluating Sources


 * 1) All the citations that I checked worked and support the claims of the articles.
 * 2) Sources are reliable and unbiased.

Checking the Talk Page


 * 1) The only discussion on this page was the adding of a couple paragraphs to the article.
 * 2) It is within the scope of WikiProject Visual Arts and is rated a C-class article.