User:Maggierenee79/sandbox

1. What stub did you choose? Why did you choose this one? Copy and past the URL link into your Sandbox

I chose a stub article called “Worm Theology”. I am a Christian so I thought it would be interesting to find some stub articles relating to religion and se what they say.

Worm theology

2. How do you know that it's a stub: Identify where on the page that you know that this is a stub

At the bottom of the article after the references it says that “ This Christian theology article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.” It is a very short article also which helps me identify that’s its a stub as well.

3. What are some missing or under-developed parts of this stub? A good way to determine this is to compare your stub to a more developed article on the same topic and category. So for example, if you chose a stub-article on a horror novel, look for another Wikipedia article on another horror novel that is more fully developed. What is missing on your stub page in comparison? You should devote 4-5 sentences to answering this question.

In a couple sections of the article it says that there is a citation needed in those areas. As well as it needs more specific sections about which branches of Christianity would support that idea and why. The author quotes the Bible in one part of the the article but I didn’t see it referenced in the reference area. This is something that I question because I would assume you would need to put a reference in for the Bible just like any other book.

4. In particular, locate the "References" section of the stub. What, if anything, is listed in the references? If the references are hyperlinked, do the links still work?

One of the links didn’t work for me and one reference is cited twice. There are are only two references and they are missing one for the Bible.

5. And, when you compare this stub to a well developed article of the same category type, what sections of the overall article are present, and what are missing?

The article is missing a foundations section. What the article has at the moment could fit into it but would definitely need to be expanded on. Not all branches of Christianity fully support worm theology so that is something that should be added as well and explained. It is also missing related topics.

From Dr. Hildebrandt: Good job on this, Margaret. I think that you were having problems with citations on SA #24 earlier, yes? If so, it looks like you got it figured out. It also looks like you are on track to decide the article that you will edit soon.

SA # 26

= Festival of Nations (St. Louis) = Festivals such as this one is beneficial in many ways. It not only gives Americans the taste of other countries but opens their eyes to their cultures. By allowing Americans to taste others countries food we can see the similarities and differences within other countries and their own. From Dr. Hildebrandt: Nice job, Margaret! I'm glad you chose this one!