User:Magicanonymous/Lamellipodium/Sintim24 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Magicanonymous


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Magicanonymous/Lamellipodium?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Lamellipodium
 * Lamellipodium

= Evaluate the drafted changes =

Lead
There is no lead in the draft, so you probably think that there's nothing to add. I personally think that there is enough information in the lead of the article, because anymore would have probably had to go in the content area.

Content
No content added. Even though it may seem like there is enough information you will probably find more information from other sources because I see that not that there can be more sources used.

Tone and Balance
From the original article I do see that everything makes sense, but from your end I don't really know if you really understand the context because I haven't seen anything in your own words.

Sources and References
You only used one source. Definitely need to add more.

Organization
From the original source everything is organized and in place under the subheadings, but you haven't added anything so I can't really determine your organization skills.

Images and Media
You added an image which is good because the original source did not have any. I like that you also added context under the image instead of just leaving it there. I get a clear explanation about what I am seeing.

Overall Feedback
Overall, since there wasn't anything other than the image that you added to the source I couldn't really dive into the feedback as much because I didn't have anything to go off of. I would say to add more information to the article. There are also a lot of other sources you can probably find online. If you can't find any, maybe try some journal entries. Remember you had to choose an article that needed some more work put into it, so if you are not really adding anything to me it's saying the article has enough information already.