User:MagpieMeadows/Argo/Annika.Nicholas Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

MagpieMeadows


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:MagpieMeadows/Argo


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Argo

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The Lead Section – will state the most important information, give good overview of the

rest of the article. It will be concise but avoid repeating the article content.


 * The short summary of what the Argo was is very concise and specific but allows for the rest of the article to break it down further.
 * Could you say something about how it's addressed in other sources as to introduce that section later on?
 * Could you add more pictures? Or at least more description to the images included in the article?

Clarity of Article Structure – each important aspect of the article should have its own clear and distinct section


 * The order of the article is well organized and breaks the information into reasonable categories.

Coverage Balance – the article should be a balanced summary of existing resources without a dominant viewpoint


 * The article favors the legend but it is consistent with the amount of resources that it uses.

Content Neutrality – the article should not try to persuade the reader of a specific idea or view


 * The content of the article is neutral and provides basic facts to form specific opinions.
 * Can you take away some of the sentence starters, "...sources claim..."?
 * Could you add in different perspectives about the ship?

Sources – article content should be supported by good and reliable sources


 * The article exhibits several sources from commentary during that time, specifically Herodotus is being beneficially used.
 * The article has sources intermixed throughout the article, creating a summary backed with good information.
 * The sources are placed in a way that makes sense.