User:MagpieMeadows/Argo/Sailing to Byzantium 2021 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

MagpieMeadows


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:MagpieMeadows/Argo


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Argo

Lead Section
The lead section has only been altered a little bit, but I think that this is fine, as it is effective in concisely introducing the subject, and its relevance, to the reader. I do appreciate the addition of the information that the ship was created with the help of the gods, as this begins to let the reader know about the divine significance of this subject.

Clarity of Article Structure
The article has far more body and coherence, and I liked the shift to shorter, bite-sized, passages of information. The inclusion of information surrounding the 1963 film adaptation is effective in highlighting relevant recent reproductions of the ship in media, and I also enjoyed that the editor placed Jason's death at the end of the Legend section - feels better this way.

Coverage Balance
The editor has included a bunch of new and relevant sources to the article body to support the content, and maintains a balance of section length to article importance. The article also recognizes different depictions of the ship within various forms of Greek art and writing.

Content neutrality
The article does not seem to be attempting to persuade the reader toward any sort of conclusion, and maintains a very neutral tone throughout.

Overall Impressions
I really like all of the inclusions that you have made on the article so far, and I think that your new subsection is very relevant and interesting. I feel as though you have strengthened the article greatly and connected it to another important source, being the film, leading viewers to peruse further readings on the subject. Great job!