User:Magsmundt/Evaluate an Article

Evaluation of Hypocognition
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Name of article: Hypocognition
 * This article is in a field of interest, and regards human cognition and the circumstances in which language does not provide the proper tools for describing certain cognitive phenomena

Lead

 * Guiding questions


 * The Lead section is present, but is very brief
 * The article has a Lead section, but provides very little information regarding the topic
 * The Lead section is concise, perhaps too much. More information regarding a more concrete idea of what hypocognition is would helpful for the rest of the article

Content

 * Guiding questions


 * The article provides some applicable information regarding the topic, but has some tangents that do seem relevant to the overall topic
 * The article contains information that is old, but also contains some information that is more up to date
 * The article contains information that should not be present, and is lacking in other, more general information regarding the nature and practical history/implications of hypocognition

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions


 * This article carries a neutral tone
 * There are no heavy biases within this articles

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions


 * This article has reliable sources to back up its claims, but there are facts and pieces of information that are irrelevant to the topic
 * The sources provided seem current and reliable, but sometimes appear to be on irrelevant topics
 * The links do work

Organization

 * Guiding questions


 * This article is very short, and does not necessarily provide all of the best information regarding the topic
 * No spelling errors were found; while no grammar rules were strictly broken, this article could have been written better stylistically
 * The sections that hypocognition is broken down into are logical, but contain information that is irrelevant to the topic and the subsection

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions


 * The article contains no images

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions


 * The only contribution made to the talk page for this page is regarding the paraphrasing of a particular section from a particular source; no "true" discussion has occurred regarding the content, other than a proposed question for improvement.

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions


 * This article is a solid start to regarding hypocognition; however, it needs several levels of improvement, including more information regarding what hypocognition actually is, as well as its relevance in the field of cognitive linguistics.

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback: