User:Mahaletn/Ethiopian Golden Age of music/PSCI226 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Mahaletn


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Mahaletn/Ethiopian_Golden_Age_of_music?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Ethiopian Golden Age of music

Lead:
Updates to the lead are useful and bring the main topic of the article to more focus. The lead is precise and well sourced, framing the overall article to come well and is not overly detailed.

Content:
The added content is constructive and well researched. It brings in new concepts, people, and ideas that were previously not involved within the article itself. The content is to the point and up to date,

Tone/Balance:
There is no sign of any bias, no viewpoints or claims are made without justification and citation of why they have been made and each point is weighted equally.

Sources & References:
Many of the sources and references come from newspaper articles and record companies. As the topic is not one commonly seen in peer-reviewed academic journals and usually not written about in pursuit of greater academic knowledge, the sources that writer has gathered is an impressive culmination of the available information one the topic. It comes from from a diverse range of sources and has no signs of bias.

Organization:
The article is clearly written and well formatted. It is free from grammatical errors and is thoughtfully split up.

Overall impressions:
Very good additions that contribute well to the article. It is well sourced and well formatted, and has an unbiased and diverse approach to laying out the information. If some more obviously reliable sources could be found it may strengthen the article's claims even more.