User:Maiab3/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1

 * Article title: Chimimōryō:
 * Article Evaluation:
 * "The article itself appears to be written neutrally, and the content provided is relevant to the topic. While there are some citations in the article, many claims proposed as facts are not given a source following the fact. Although the citation is reliable, the references given is lacking heavily, as there is only one novel listed to support the article. However, this does address an equity gap, as Japanese folklore is typically underrepresented within traditional media."
 * "If given the opportunity, I would make changes by providing citations to the names of these monsters, and find alternative citations that are not only linked to other Wikipedia pages. The last edit in the talk page was also made in 2014, so possibly driving more discussion would be helpful in making this a well-rounded opportunity."
 * Sources:
 * https://dbpedia.org/page/Chimim%C5%8Dry%C5%8D
 * https://searchworks.stanford.edu/view/13839237
 * Sources:
 * https://dbpedia.org/page/Chimim%C5%8Dry%C5%8D
 * https://searchworks.stanford.edu/view/13839237

Option 2

 * Article title: Education Justice Project:
 * Article Evaluation:
 * "The majority of the article is written neutrally, but, one of the citations is taken from the University of Illinois and shows a slight positive bias. The content written on the article is relevant, and also has mid-tier citations to back each claim up. Lastly, the article does not tackle one of Wikipedia's equity gaps.""If I were to implement changes, I would update the claims of the article as the last time it was edited was in 2019. I would also try to find more citations about current statistics, as well as finding alternative references (instead of utilizing information from the university itself)."
 * Sources:
 * https://docs.google.com/document/d/1DRcn7sQ5zyvbzaSowd_6c9GqCDUOl5-d/edit
 * https://www.stlpr.org/tags/education-justice-project
 * https://ices.library.ubc.ca/index.php/criticaled/article/view/186323

Option 3

 * Article title: Federal Way Public Schools:
 * Article Evaluation: :"While the article's content is relevant to the topic, it is not written neutrally nor are the citations reliable. Although there are multiple citations throughout the article itself, there is a excessive reliance on a few key sources. Lastly, the article does not tackle one of Wikipedia's equity gaps.""To improve this article, I would make edits according to Wikipedia and the talk page. This includes, but is not limited to: Creating a more neutral tone, making more succinct points (removing the need for excessive reliance to references/primary resources) and doing a more in-depth analysis on the talk page. It appears that a major contributor is close to Federal Way Public Schools, so taking a look at the article's history would be helpful."
 * Sources:
 * https://www.usnews.com/education/k12/washington/districts/federal-way-school-district-102292#:~:text=In%20Federal%20Way%20School%20District%2C%2045%25%20of%20elementary%20students%20tested,above%20that%20level%20for%20math.
 * https://washingtonstatereportcard.ospi.k12.wa.us/ReportCard/ViewSchoolOrDistrict/100086
 * https://www.fwps.org/about-us/annual-report
 * https://kingcounty.gov/en/-/media/depts/local-services/permits/legislation-public-review/school-impact-fees-attachment-B-federal-way-cfp-2023.ashx