User:Maireob/Environmental impact of paper straw production/Bibliography

You will be compiling your bibliography and creating an outline of the changes you will make in this sandbox.

Outline of proposed changes
Articles and there relevence:

Paper straws contain toxic ‘forever chemicals’ — could be worse than plastic: study:

The article offers a critical analysis of the environmental assertions associated with paper straws, revealing research outcomes that question their presumed ecological advantages. It brings attention to concerns regarding the potential toxicity of paper straws, particularly regarding the presence of poly- and perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), urging readers to reassess their perceptions of these purportedly environmentally friendly substitutes for plastic.

Paper Straws: Are they Really As Eco-Friendly?:

The article challenges the widespread belief that paper straws offer a superior environmental alternative to plastic ones, delving into the complexities surrounding this perception. While acknowledging the well-documented environmental hazards associated with plastic straws, including their slow decomposition and harm to marine ecosystems, the article questions whether paper straws are a flawless solution. It argues that the manufacturing process of paper straws involves substantial energy usage, greenhouse gas emissions, and forest depletion, diminishing trees' ability to absorb carbon dioxide. Additionally, practical issues such as rapid degradation of paper straws, resulting in a subpar drinking experience and potential wastage, are highlighted. This article will be used for its relevant information regarding paper straws detriment to the environment through pollution and deforestation.

‘Eco-friendly’ paper straws, plastic straws both found to contain forever chemicals:

The information provided is relevant to an article discussing the drawbacks of paper straws because it highlights the presence of harmful chemicals, such as per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), in various types of straws, including paper. This underscores a significant flaw in paper straws, as they are often marketed as eco-friendly alternatives but may contain substances that pose environmental and health risks. Additionally, the mention of stainless steel straws as a more sustainable option due to their PFAS-free composition and recyclability contrasts with the limitations of paper straws, further illustrating their flaws. Furthermore, the discussion of broader PFAS contamination issues and regulatory efforts underscores the need to address these concerns within the context of paper straw usage, enhancing the understanding of their environmental impact and advocating for more sustainable alternatives.