User:Majorartstudio/Web design/Colin Denny Peer Review

General info
Majorartstudio
 * Whose work are you reviewing?
 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Majorartstudio/Web_design?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Web design

Evaluate the drafted changes
I dont know much of anything about web design. But the first 2 sentences of 1988-2001 you said first website two times in both of those sentences, I would change that and word it a little different. Also, the third sentence is the only enjoyable thing on the website was the color blue? In the fourth sentence fix web site to website. The fifth sentence needs to be reworked in my opinion; you say "were able find its way" to me that doesn't make sense. In the 6th sentence fix it to say "the structures in the websites were very fragile" and what do you mean "contain it" contain what?

In Tools and technologies your organization needs some work. The article is broad about the different tools and stuff they used, then you go into context about UX and half of that topic is based off of UX. The tone changes between the you and the original author. Fix the last sentence, say UX design mostly focuses on the products rather web based.

In skills and techniques fix the first sentence I am having a hard time understanding what you mean, operate on what? In the second sentence fix they are constantly updating and changing everything. The third sentence needs re-worked I don't understand what you are trying to say. In the fourth sentence fix web designer to web designers, and what do you mean by the websites they want on it? You say "in the bulk of web designers spend all their time designing" I dont think in the bulk needs to be added, also is speed like the internet connection? In the last sentence who spends a lot of time doing testing, working etc. and also try not to use a lot in writing, find a better word that you can substitute it with.

You only have 2 references, not sure if you haven't got the chance to add any more or if you forgot but you should add a couple more references.