User:Majoreditor/Utilities

=Majoreditor's Utilities=

Wiki Principles
Levels of competence

Information and resources for contributors

 * Category:Wikipedia style guidelines
 * Category:Wikipedia how-to for a full list of help topics
 * Who writes Wikipedia, essential information to understand when reading articles (for new readers)
 * Simplified ruleset, essential information to understand when editing articles (for new editors)
 * Category:Wikipedia
 * Category:Wikipedia resources for researchers
 * Frequently asked questions
 * Policies and guidelines for contributors
 * Glossary of common Wikipedia terms
 * How to write a great article
 * Public domain resources
 * Manual of style
 * Contributing to articles outside your native language
 * WikiProjects, writing and style guidelines for specific disciplines
 * Resolving disputes

Edit Counters

 * Interiot's Wannabe Kate
 * Page history

GA Review

 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

1. It is well written. In this respect:
 * (a) the prose is clear and the grammar is correct; and
 * (b) it complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, jargon, words to avoid, fiction, and list incorporation.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable. In this respect, it:
 * (a) provides references to sources used;
 * (b) cites reliable sources for quotations and for material that is challenged or likely to be challenged, preferably using inline citations for longer articles; and
 * (c) contains no original research.

3. It is broad in its coverage. In this respect, it:
 * (a) addresses the major aspects of the topic; and
 * (b) stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary details (see summary style).

4. It is neutral; that is, it represents viewpoints fairly and without bias.

5. It is stable; that is, it does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of an ongoing edit war. Vandalism reversions, proposals to split or merge content, and improvements based on reviewers' suggestions do not apply.

6. Any images it contains are appropriate to the subject, with succinct captions and acceptable copyright status. Non-free images must meet the criteria for fair use images and be labeled accordingly. A lack of images does not disqualify an article from Good Article status.

Status:

✅

Reporting
|Admin Noticeboard-Incidents

Copyvio

Vandalism

 * Vandalism
 * PageName ~
 * PageName ~ (unintentional vandalism/test)
 * PageName ~ (unintentional removal of content)
 * PageName ~ (suitable for nonsense)
 * PageName ~ (variant for blankings)
 * PageName ~ (please stop)
 * PageName ~ (obvious vandalism)
 * PageName ~ (last warning)
 * PageName ~ (last warning)

Editor review
A quick link to see who's on editor review so I can offer up comments.



Signpost
Link to Signposts

Happy Holidays
  You got a Christmas card! → → →

New articles
I created these articles:


 * Joseph Raya
 * [Joseph Tawil]]


 * Atlanta

Other selected articles
More articles::


 * ''Mother Teresa

Some other articles I've edited:


 * Melkite Greek Catholic Church


 * Melkite


 * Lake Winfield Scott


 * Basil the Great


 * Gregory the Theologian


 * /About/
 * /Genealogy/