User:Makalaperezz/Environmental criminology/Trijanas Peer Review

General info
Makalaperezz
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead

The lead does not appear to be updated yet by my peer. The lead includes introductory sentence which is environmental criminology. However, the sections of the article are briefly mentioned in the lead. The lead can be a little more detailed with an overview of what’s to come.

Content

The content added is relevant to the topic of environmental criminology. It appears to be up-to-date and covers various aspects of environmental criminology, including theories, practical applications, and historical perspectives. The article doesn’t address Wikipedia’s equity gaps or historically underrepresented populations, which could be a potential area for improvement.

Tone and Balance

The tone of the content appears neutral overall in the article. There are no obvious claims that heavily favor a particular position. The viewpoints seem to be balanced, with different theories and perspectives being presented. The content isn’t overly persuasive towards one position or away from another.

Sources and References

The new content is backed up by a good working source. The sources appear to be thorough, covering various aspects of environmental criminology. The sources are red in the reference section stating to check date however, the links did work, and I was able to access everything from it.

Organization

The article written seems to be well-written, clear, and easy to read. It does appear to have one misspelling. However, in practical applications there could be a space in between the word mapping and system.

Examples:

·      Under Practical applications section 2nd paragraph, the sentence'''. “' Geography was also considered in law enforcement, through use of large pin maps to show where crime incidents occurred. Mapping and analysis of crime is now entering a new phase with the use of computerized crime mappingsystems by the police'' “. Could use a space between “mapping and systems.”

·      In the section titled Practical applications the third paragraph, third sentence the word “Anoyther” should be changed to “another”.

·      Same section in the 4th paragraph, 2nd sentence “Could be that the place is poorly supervised, has poor "place management", has poor lighting or other characteristics.” There could be an easier transition for the reader.

Images and Media

My peer did not add any images that enhanced the understanding of the topic as far as from what I could tell.

Overall impressions

The content added has improved the overall quality of the article by providing more coverage of environmental criminology. The strength of the content includes its relevance to the topic and its neutral tone. To improve, the content could focus on ensuring all links are working and up to date as well as correcting the few areas of grammar issues and updating pictures to make an overall article better.