User:Makayla Stanley/The Jungle Book (2016 film)/Zxmaria Peer Review

'''Your goal with a peer review is to identify specific ways the article could be improved, and note any major problems that ought to be fixed. Consider these questions:'''

'''Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?'''

Everything in the article appears to be relevant to the article topic and therefore did not distract me from the over goal of the writing.

'''Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?'''

"Therefore, anthropomorphism is more likely in cases where nonhuman agents do not function the way they are intended"

This is a good explanation. I might try to word it differently so it seems more neutral.

Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?

In the Voice Cast section for Baloo and Kaa maybe you could explain why the directors decided to change how the characters were originally written. Did they have to change their characteristics to fit the story line better? Baloo was originally depicted as a sleep bear but in the movie he was seen as a carefree friend bear. How did this change how he was anthropomorphized? I would also write this for Kaa as well.

'''Check the citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?'''

Links work and seem to support the claim but some links said my connection was not private.

'''Is each fact supported by an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?'''

The websites I was able to see seemed reliable. One was a government website which seems to be neutral.

'''Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that should be added?'''

The information appears to not be out of date and all that needs to be added as of now is the reasons as to why the writers changed the characters to fit the movie plot and how it changed the way they were anthropomorphized.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

LorraineRodz


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:LorraineRodz/sandbox


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)