User:Makbwiki/Kui language (India)/Juliaa.bibik Peer Review

Peer review

Lead

The lead includes a basic introduction on the language, however there is no further content, so the lead does not provide specific information on what follows. The introductory sentence contains basic information on what the article is about, the different name of the language and where it is spoken. No, the lead does not include descriptions of the articles major sections as there are no other sections Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? The lead mentions Odisha and Odia Script, which later is not mentioned in the article. The lead is short and concise

Content

The content only includes information on the phonology of the language which is relevant to the topic. The content includes data based on the 2011 census so it is not up to date. Most of the content and information is missing, historical information on where the language is spoken, by who it is spoken along with other relevant content that would give the reader a good sense of what the Kui language is about.

Tone and Balance

Other than the phonology there is no other content therefore it cannot be labeled as either neutral or biased.

Sources and References

The content on the phonology of the language is backed up by a reliable source located under the fourth reference. The phonological content does accurately portrays the information found in the source. The sources are not thorough, there are many more peer-reviewed sources available that would allow the author to add further information on the language beyond just its phonology. Most of the sources are current. The sources are limited and not written by a diverse spectrum of authors. All of the links except the first one work.

Organization

The content is limited, however the phonological information is well organized into a table format and therefore easy to read. Other than the table the article does not include any images on the topic. I would suggest adding images of the location where the language is spoken, along with images of the people.

The article is supported by more than 3 reliable sources therefore it meets Wikipedia's Notability requirements, however I would suggest to add more in order to fill the content with more information on the topic. The list of sources is not exhaustive and it does not accurately represent all available literature on the language. The article does follow the patter of other articles on languages. It contains an info box, lead and content section. The articles links other articles on similar languages.

Overall impressions

Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? The article is not complete. It has very limited content, therefore it does not accurately portray all the information available on the language. A variety of sources should be added in order to add more relevant content. The lead of the article is strong however, the article lacks further content mentioned in the lead.