User:Makemi/Citizendium

Using "Random page" on CZ, and my Workspace as a scratchpad to compare articles. GFDL compliant, or not? Respectful of the work of others, or not? You decide.


 * 1) Microbial metabolism No mention of WP as of 4/27/07 - Current CZ article Diff. Very little change aside from removing sections with excessive technical language, and the small but significant change of switching two instances of "low" to "high".


 * 1) Alfred Nobel No mention of WP as of 4/27/07 - Current CZ article


 * 1) Nucleic acid metabolism taken from Nucleotide, no attribution to Wikipedia.
 * 2) F. Albert Cotton does attribute WP.
 * 3) Healing Arts no obvious WP equivalent, no references listed, although one external link.
 * 4) Arginine vasopressin receptor 1B taken from Arginine vasopressin receptor 1B looks like a lot of references were added, although the original also has substantial referencing. No mention of WP.
 * 5) Lausanne another CZ original, this time a single sentence.
 * 6) Glossary of atmospheric reentry gives credit to WP, no change.