User:Makylam18/Management of dyslexia/AngelOffley Peer Review

General info
Makylam18
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Makylam18/Management of dyslexia
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Management of dyslexia

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead

The lead looks to give a quick overview of managing dyslexia and it summarizes the main points like the different strategies and approaches. I recommend mentioning the specific areas like reading skills, comprehensive techniques, multi-sensory programs, special education methods, adaptive technology, and alternative therapies.

Content and Sources/References

The content you've added is definitely relevant and covers a good range of strategies for managing dyslexia! I would make sure every claim is backed by reliable sources. I think it would also be super helpful if you were to include how these strategies work for underrepresented populations!

Tone and Balance

You've kept the content neutral, which is really good! Just make sure there's no bias, especially when talking about controversial treatments like nutritional supplements and chiropractic manipulation.

Organization

The draft is clear, but you could make it more concise. For example, there were a few spelling errors that were crossed out, but I did notice that was you correcting the original article, so I get it! I would break all the content into clear sections to make it easier to read, like separating strategies for specific skills, comprehensive approaches, and adaptive technology.

Images and Media

I believe images are optional, but adding images or diagrams would definitely help illustrate key points and make the article more engaging!