User:Malmanza0218/Cultural impact assessment/NicoleTirado1 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? Malmanza0218
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Malmanza0218/sandbox

Tone and balance evaluation: The article is in favor of cultural impact assessments.
==== Sources and references evaluation: The article references three sources but doesn't yet provide a direct link to those sources. Sources are listed back to back at the bottom of page; making them hard to follow and distinguish from one another. ====

==== Organization evaluation: The article provides a clear definition of CIA and goes into depth of how it is applied. I didn't see any grammatical errors but I do recommend to break ideas down into sections. Being that there is a lot of information, this will make it easier for readers to follow along. ====

New Article Evaluation: Provide links to other subjects discussed within your article to make it more discoverable. Make sources more easily available.
==== Overall evaluation: The article is well versed; the author knows what they are discussing. The author discusses a variety of subjects within the article. I would recommend to separate ideas/topics and provide transitions from one idea/topic to another so that readers are better able to understand. I would also recommend to add links to sources within the article and the sources cited at the bottom of page. Add a link within the article when you mention the Maori people and any other key words you feel will give readers a better understanding of the topic. ====