User:Malvinabeska/sandbox

The article seems to be neutral other than the statement of Don Eagle being rare in Canada. There are no claims or frames that appear heavily biased toward a particular position. Some references in the biography seem to be missing when there is a whole paragraph of information and no reference to accompany it. Also, there is a magazine as a reference which is not a reliable source. Everything in the article is relevant to the article topic. I found that there was no distraction and that there was an equal amount of focus on each topic.
 * Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference?
 * Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?