User:Manakbajaj20/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?:
Tetralogy of Fallot

Why have you chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article as tetralogy of fallot was a concept I learned in my second-year anatomy course that stuck with me. The idea behind the birth defect was that it was a system of 4 different malformations that would result in the larger defect. The overall concept about each defect having feedback on the next symptom really shows the inner workings of the heart and medicine and how equilibrium is necessary for balance.

Lead Section
The lead includes an introductory sentence that is concise and describes the article topic. The lead also includes a brief description of the article's major sections. The lead does not include information that is not present in the article. The lead lacks important details as it does not give a holistic count of the disease in the first paragraph. The reader should be able to understand the defect and its parts in the first paragraph and the second paragraph should include additional detail.

Content
The article's content is relevant and up-to-date. There is some missing content on the article as there is an imbalance between the sub-headings and its information as some parts are larger than others (epidemiology vs prognosis).

Tone and Balance
The article does an excellent job at remaining neutral. There are certain viewpoints that are underrepresented (epidemiology), but overall it does a good job staying neutral. The article does not attempt to persuade the reader but only to inform of the defect.

Sources and References
The article has a variety of different sources within the past 20 years. As there are only 58 references, the article needs to have more citations to solidify its information.

Organization and Writing Quality
The article is written well and without spelling errors. The article is not well-organized as there is a need for more logical flow of information from proceeding to a new heading to the next.

Images and Media
There should be greater number of images with diagrams and processes.

Talk Page Discussion
The article's talk page has a good level of discussion as there are some medical students updating the article content. However, some of the talk page discussions are petty arguments about editing.

Overall Impressions
The article can be improved. It has good supporting materials, but the organization can result in a greater level of quality along with new citations and additional content.